|
Back in the day, circa 2000, whenever I got into a conversation with other filmmakers about what I was doing, I felt as if I was up on my soapbox, evangelizing spirit in tow, urging them to embrace the burgeoning new medium, web video. It just seemed so obvious to me. But my efforts to enlighten were in vain, which in many ways led me into a sort of self-imposed exile from the San Francisco film community I was so rooted in.
Here’s a few experts from a journal I kept during those formative years, 9/20/2000: “…These last few months have been a flurry of emotions: self-doubt, exhilaration, joy, sorrow. How much longer can I continue my chronicles? ...This is a revolutionary time in the world of filmmaking (independent that is). I believe I’m on the cusp and the rest must catch up.”
12/14/2000: “Week 23 of the valet chronicles…right now I feel as if I have no allies. I know this is a continuous thread in these entries, but it’s how I feel, isolated.”
Somehow I kept posting 3-4 minute episodes (one a week) of my first series, Valet Chronicles, and ended up with 37 in eight months. I also make short films for festivals, but I had never experienced this type of filmmaking, where within a week’s time you make a film, distribute it and get heartfelt feedback, via email, from all over the world. And now, eight years later, perhaps the soapbox isn’t necessary, but what is the state of original web video content? Have any of those filmmakers I was sermonizing to, whose work I know and love, taken that digital step into the new frontier? Are critics critiquing web video from a substantial place of insight? And, perhaps, most importantly, how is the content that is being offered shaping viewers’ tastes and expectations of what’s to come? |